* * * Inception not the most original film. But for those not paying attention it might feel that way.
Inception reminds me of 5 films majorly. But still in the art of it's own world feels unique and original.
1. Dark City.
2. Total Recall.
3. What Dreams May Come.
4. The Matrix.
5. Eternal Sunshine for the Spotlessmind.
I have not seen the "13th Floor" & only elements of "Existanz" remind me of this. Maybe its the portable of the unexplained-super-science-shared-dreaming-device. (Also the device in "Inception" isn't a sexual metaphor & and of course is a dream not a video game) The idea that you really never know if your in or out of a dream and the disorientation of that deception reminds me of how some of the 'Nightmare on Elmstreet' films are structured however those films give strong clues and 'Inception' does not. Also an element of the LONG-LOST-LOVE plot device from "Shutter Island" and of course the questions of *sanity* are in "Inception" but it deals with that slightly better in this film than in that film and I say slightly because it's mainly just a distracting muguffan from the plot at hand ; aka the 'corprate espionage' a far more interesting plot than the wispy (*run now spoiler*) romance plot.
This is the point where I remind you that not only am I fixing to spoil INCEPTION. I'm fixing to spoil the plots of the 5 films I just mentioned in the above. "Existanz" and "Nightmare on Elm St." will not spoil the film but if you've not seen the 5 above mentioned comparisons. Leave this review. Run, run, now!!!!
Okay now back to sanity.
Here we go.
First of all "Dark City" a film about an alien race who've kidnaped humans and change their memories in order to discover the secret of the human soul. Night after night on a timer they change the setting using a thing called 'tuning' (Changing the surroundings and landscapes around humans while simultaniously changing their memories to see how human beings react under different circumstances in search for the human soul), the film "Inception" employs the concept of an architect to do this within the dream strait that is. They've added extra rules but the conept of memories fading and creating realities from these memories and the search for peaceful memories is still an interesting thruline throughout. And the cliche of some lonely romanitic beach is indeed attached. (Shell Beach)
Total Recall leaves you with an ambiguous ending. And througout gives you awkward moments allowing you to doubt what's reality and what's Recall the same way this film emplores that mainly through it's horribly disjointed editing to create the feeling of doubt as to whats real and what's not. Also considering Mari Coliard's repeat this theme ad~nauseum. Also the wink that hey maybe the fact that you're a super agent is an absurd dream anyways,
In the film "What Dreams May Come" based on the highly praised novel by 'I am Legend' author Richart Matheson. Robin William's character creates his own heaven. (Based on what appear to be Thomas Kinkade paintings) to live out an eternity with his wife, a pefect world they can grow old together in eternity. But several times when he sees her she's a fantasy, a shade of his memories of her. The same exact thing happens ad-nausum in "Inception" when Leo's character is in the dream state. Also the idea of a strange disjointed hell like state is in "Inception". So if I ever meat Chris Nolan and he's not seen the movie or read the novel "What Dreams May Come", I probably won't believe him.
The corrolations to the Matrix are ovbious and been bled to death in other reviews and I don't give a shit. In the Matrix the characters are capable of strange feats of gravity and reality but other than that there aren't very many corrilations. The Matrix point was a strait forward allegory to whatever society I don't really remember or care. "Inception"'s plot is far far more involved. And it's also bloody ovbious when they're in the Matrix and when they are not. And there is no romantic themes in Matrix or comrodery with the group so the comparisons only have to do with style not the actual plot or themes of the films because plot & themes in these two are far drastically different.
The film only slightly reminds of "Eternal Sunshine for the Spotless Mind" and there isn't any one specific thing I can point to. The plot of "Eternal Sunshine" was romantic. The romantic aspects in "Inception" seemed like an after thought and was far too rushed than they needed to be adding and interested backpoint to the corporate espionage plot that the film is claiming to have but really the film "Inception" is 100% about Leo's character Cobb. The corporate espionage is more of a muguffan. Because we're never fully explained why it's that important. Which is a very weak point of the film.
The film will twist your mind and is so ambigus at points that it seems to be more about mood and style & higher themes than actual plot. It does not deserve any merits of originality for the script however the visual effects & cinematography of the film are absurdly good. There are plot holes in the film which are probably devised purposely by Nolan to confuse and disorient the viewer.
7 1/2 out of 10 stars : Don't think too hard & don't lose yourself in the plotholes sit back & enjoy the exposition, the ride, & the film. Don't compare it to other films & enjoy the ride.
Also you might have noticed that I refer to both the 'romance' and 'corprate espionage' plots as muguffans because they both are. This film is far more about themes and style than plot. But that's not a bad thing for me. This film literally and figuratively allows you no leg room to stand on. Which is the mark of a well thought out and masterfully directed peice of cinema. (Even though it's derivative, devisive & full of plot holes I like to reffer to as questions or huh? moments.)
Hmm did anyone else notice the french music in the movie. It kinda reminded me of another movie with Marie Collard ? (She won an oscar for playing her silly people. ^.^)
And in a nutshell see this biatch in Imax and Mr. Gordon Levitt is great. And Mrs. Ellen Page adorable as always.
Peace out Bitches.
I also had the distintive pleasure of seeing this film at a private screening room last Monday at Warner Bros. I wasn't allowed to talk about it until it was released and just saw it for the second time in theatres at an I-Max so this was my review based on that secondary viewing experience.
I still love that the wall climbing scene utilized a technique developed in the 20's (A rotating room) and people still think that's an amazing feat of new special effect technology. That's hilarious.
Did you notice how bizzare it was that when Leo's wife kills herself she's in a hotel room um across from the room Leo's in, not the one Leo De Caprio's in? And supposedly that was after they wake up?
Leo's missing a totem? Clue much!?!
The film deserves at least 2 oscars Cinematography & Visual Effects.
You can 100% tell this was the directors passion project.
"We'll meet again, don't know where don't know when."
*.* Was my brother the only person to notice the kids at the end of the movie are wearing the exact same clothing as in his dreams ?
Okay I can't stand it, HE WAS IN A DREAM THE WHOLE TIME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Or at least the clues support it, it's too ambiguous given the fact that the director seperates the characters in some scenes which definately aren't a part of Leo's subconsious. So either or really.
Sunday, July 18, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
What are some of these plot holes you speak of? I'm not saying there aren't any, but I only saw the film once and was way too engrossed to notice any (bloody good filmmaking tends to do that). However (spoiler) I do think that if you go with the ending where the top doesn't stop spinning, the whole film pretty much falls apart.
ReplyDeleteWhy again is it so important that they implant this guys memory. Why? What does Ken Watanabe's character even do. What was the original corporation that hired them? There are no details of any backstory of Cobb's character other than his wife. There are no details other than what they give us. Everything is set up on themes and ideas. The backstory isn't explained. We take the whole espionage and technology at absolute face value. Besides as I'd stated earlier the plotholes or (unanswered) questions were purposely designed by a smart director. ^.^ I loved the film I'm just being critical.
ReplyDeleteIf the top had stopped spinning or even coninued perfectly I would have been unhappy but that it wobbled and teased me is something I really enjoyed.
ReplyDeleteBesides I hate the gunhoe attitude of Ellen Page's character she could go through with the whole thing but I thought should have been a least a little tiny, tiny, bit more skeptical of the entire process. But that's just me nit picking. I didn't direct the damn thing.
ReplyDeleteI know what you're saying about some of the missing backstory. I think the lack of details on Cobb make the film more interesting since there are small teases throughout the film as we learn more about him. As far as Ken Watanabee and Cylian Murphy, I think they are in the "energy" business...then again, I may have imagined that....all in the spirit of the film I suppose.
ReplyDeleteEllen Page's character's lack of skepticism was the only script detail that I found off-putting. You're right, she dives right in, no questions asked. The best was when Cobb was "dreaming" in private and she grabs the plug from the machine and just jacks in without any hesitation. Did someone teach her how to use that machine while we weren't looking? Does she know where those needles (I assume they are like needles) have been? That's kind of sketchy...I wouldn't just shove things into my arm like that...but that's just me.
I too really liked the film a lot and thought it was the most effective use of filmmaking I've seen in a while (all summer at least). It's good to criticize though. Nothing's perfect and it makes you a better filmmaker too. You can learn from what you see, what works, what doesn't, etc.
Never mind that..where the hell did the machine come from in the first place? I feel like they mentioned that and I forgot, perhaps somewhere in the scenes explaining how he and Mal [Marion Cotillard, not mari coliard, you should fix that typo..she might get upset] were experimenting with the device.
ReplyDeleteI too loved the little wobble of the top in the end. It did spin for a long time..but I think it's just a really good top...
Yeap. Hahaha I'm leaving my spelling mistake because my review on IMDB wouldn't let me use the word Muguffin so I ended up using the word Muffin instead. Hahahha. Baked goods or plot deception.
ReplyDelete